Re: The Null Problem is a Non-issue

Thank you, Norbert

> On Sunday, 7 September 2014 19:40:05 UTC+10, Norbert_Paul wrote:
>
> Just to avoid your qualifying me in your category
>
>
> > - have private definitions
>
> I'd appreciate to read your definition of the "Null Problem".

1. Since science, myself included, rejects private definitions, and those who have such definitions are disqualified, I certainly would not be presenting a private definition ("your definition of ..." ) for it: such an act would disqualify me.

I am quite happy with any public definition, from any authoritative source (wiki is not authoritative; it is an ever-changing mass), that you may wish to refer to.

The fact that there is more than one such public definition, is a sign that our science has deteriorated into ham-fisted carpentry by the blind. And of course, the blind argue with other blind men.

Since I possess the miracle of sight, I try not to argue with the blind. I don't suffer from The Null Problem, I have the Resolution.

2.
> > 1. The Null Problem does not exist in the physical universe.

I am grounded in the physical universe. I am not very good at defining, let alone discussing, a thing that does not exist.

3. But that should not pose an obstacle to progress ... As long as you suggest an authoritative source, we can progress. My statement is, the Null Problem is a Non-issue.

Cheers
Derek Received on Sun Sep 07 2014 - 23:50:12 CEST