Re: The Null Problem is a Non-issue

Derek Asirvadem wrote:
> Thank you, Norbert
>
>> On Sunday, 7 September 2014 19:40:05 UTC+10, Norbert_Paul wrote:
>>
>> Just to avoid your qualifying me in your category
>>
>>
>>> - have private definitions
>>
>> I'd appreciate to read your definition of the "Null Problem".
>
> 1. Since science, myself included, rejects private definitions, and those who have such definitions are disqualified, I certainly would not be presenting a private definition ("your definition of ..." ) for it: such an act would disqualify me.
>
> I am quite happy with any public definition, from any authoritative source (wiki is not authoritative; it is an ever-changing mass), that you may wish to refer to.
>
> The fact that there is more than one such public definition, is a sign that our science has deteriorated into ham-fisted carpentry by the blind. And of course, the blind argue with other blind men.
>
> Since I possess the miracle of sight, I try not to argue with the blind. I don't suffer from The Null Problem, I have the Resolution.

So just say a word and make me see, too. What ist the public definition of "The Null Problem" for the non-blind? Received on Mon Sep 08 2014 - 20:38:13 CEST