Re: Fitch's paradox and OWA

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:10:33 -0700, Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen_at_shaw.ca> wrote:

>Marshall wrote:

[snip]

>> There is simply no issue here to respond to. Everything you've
>> said here is either false or else it's the same as the conclusion
>> you're trying to establish.
>
>Great "refute" you seem to have had here! Among "everything" I've said here
>are a) and b). Why do you think they're false? Or you just said so out of the
>habit of saying things with no back-up reasons?
>
>Btw, usually "conclusion" is "the same" thing as what one would be "trying to
>establish". You seemed to be surprise of that. Why?

     I am impressed with the speed that you showed yourself a fool worthy of killfiling.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Fri Jan 01 2010 - 03:23:16 CET