Re: Useful Unicode

On Jan 24, 12:04 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2:22 am, Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 12:56 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > > So impressed was I by mAsterdam's japanese 'reference' symbols, I
> > > decided to add them to my list of useful unicode. Yes, I am indeed,
> > > that cool, and hereby post said list partly as a google-group test,
> > > and partly (perhaps) to assist in the more mathematical cdt
> > > discussions:
>
> > > inequality : ≠
> > > inference : →
> > > implication : ⇒
> > > not : ¬
> > > and : ∧
> > > or : ∨
> > > xor : ⊕
> > > xor : ⊻
> > > exists : ∃
> > > for all : ∀
> > > membership : ∈
> > > non-membership : ∉
> > > equivalence : ⇔
> > > empty set : ∅
> > > subset : ⊂
> > > proper subset : ⊆
> > > superset : ⊃
> > > proper superset : ⊇
> > > union : ∪
> > > intersection : ∩
> > > cartesian product : ∏
> > > division : ÷
> > > naturals : ℕ
> > > integers : ℤ
> > > rationals : ℚ
> > > reals : ℝ
> > > complex: ℂ
> > > infinity : ∞
> > > references: レ
> > > references unique: ル
> > > masterdam smiley : ☺
>
> > I believe I saw this rendered correctly, but now that I'm trying to
> > post something on sci.math most of the symbols do not render properly
> > in GG IE!
>
> yeah, checking in IE , the second xor, non-membership, the empty set,
> and the naturals, integers, etc, don't render. Hooray for microsoft
> and their continued support of standards. Market Failure 101 anyone

I saw this yesterday so used windows update to transition to IE v7 and the problem went away. Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 05:02:30 CET