Re: Useful Unicode

On Jan 24, 2:22 am, Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 12:56 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So impressed was I by mAsterdam's japanese 'reference' symbols, I
> > decided to add them to my list of useful unicode. Yes, I am indeed,
> > that cool, and hereby post said list partly as a google-group test,
> > and partly (perhaps) to assist in the more mathematical cdt
> > discussions:
>
> > inequality : ≠
> > inference : →
> > implication : ⇒
> > not : ¬
> > and : ∧
> > or : ∨
> > xor : ⊕
> > xor : ⊻
> > exists : ∃
> > for all : ∀
> > membership : ∈
> > non-membership : ∉
> > equivalence : ⇔
> > empty set : ∅
> > subset : ⊂
> > proper subset : ⊆
> > superset : ⊃
> > proper superset : ⊇
> > union : ∪
> > intersection : ∩
> > cartesian product : ∏
> > division : ÷
> > naturals : ℕ
> > integers : ℤ
> > rationals : ℚ
> > reals : ℝ
> > complex: ℂ
> > infinity : ∞
> > references: レ
> > references unique: ル
> > masterdam smiley : ☺
>
> I believe I saw this rendered correctly, but now that I'm trying to
> post something on sci.math most of the symbols do not render properly
> in GG IE!

yeah, checking in IE , the second xor, non-membership, the empty set, and the naturals, integers, etc, don't render. Hooray for microsoft and their continued support of standards. Market Failure 101 anyone.... Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 04:04:51 CET