Re: Useful Unicode

On Jan 22, 12:56 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> So impressed was I by mAsterdam's japanese 'reference' symbols, I
> decided to add them to my list of useful unicode. Yes, I am indeed,
> that cool, and hereby post said list partly as a google-group test,
> and partly (perhaps) to assist in the more mathematical cdt
> discussions:
>
> inequality : ≠
> inference : →
> implication : ⇒
> not : ¬
> and : ∧
> or : ∨
> xor : ⊕
> xor : ⊻
> exists : ∃
> for all : ∀
> membership : ∈
> non-membership  : ∉
> equivalence : ⇔
> empty set : ∅
> subset : ⊂
> proper subset : ⊆
> superset : ⊃
> proper superset : ⊇
> union : ∪
> intersection : ∩
> cartesian product : ∏
> division : ÷
> naturals : ℕ
> integers : ℤ
> rationals : ℚ
> reals : ℝ
> complex: ℂ
> infinity : ∞
> references: レ
> references unique: ル
> masterdam smiley : ☺

I believe I saw this rendered correctly, but now that I'm trying to post something on sci.math most of the symbols do not render properly in GG IE! Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 03:22:30 CET