Re: Objects and Relations

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 18 Feb 2007 11:01:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1171825318.640141.138570_at_h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


On 18 fév, 19:38, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:

> I have learnt a lot from these boards. Some have taught me theory,
> some the ability to express ideas more concisely. Even from others I
> often argue with (such as Dawn) I have learnt common views in business
> that one must expect to encounter, how difficult terminology can be to
> express with clarity, and the care one must take in making
> arguements.

> >From yourself however, Cimode, I have learnt nothing so far. Nada.
Has it crossed your mind that we did not get a chance to? And if you learned anything here? what is it exactly that you would not have better learned by reading a book from DATE or Fabian PASCAL? Out from what is written on these books, could you establish a list of items learnt here NOT containing the following words *OO is crap RM good*, *In this world there are cranks and there are .....blabla * meaningless crap... Does the world *sterile* thinking evoke anything?

> > They are the first to accuse people of intellectual dishonnesty when
> > they display tons of it at every corner...How can such incoherence not
> > hurt RM?
>
> Cimode, I really feel you have to get out there more. There is a
> definite lack of social awareness at work, which I sincerely hope you
> can remedy over time.
I assure you I am fine but thanks for worrying...(I appreciate the thought ;))

> Your claims of "Fraud this", "Fraud that",
> "Marshall is a selfish hypocrit" (!?), etc, etc, ad infinitum, with
> misquotes and changes of context... well it come across to a neutral
> reader as rather embarrassing. J.
I am sorry for your *neutrality* but I think many people here have a *right* to respond to people who basically treat people like masterdam who contradict them as *crank*, *intellectually dishonnest* and all other *insults*. I believe on the contrary that not only they should get a response but their incoherences should be exposed so that an outside participator can make up his mind...By their attitude, these people hurt the little chances RM has to implemented some day, burried under tons of stereotypical attitudes associated with RM proponents... Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 20:01:58 CET

Original text of this message