Re: Objects and Relations

On 18 fév, 17:47, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
> > I find the above lacks insight in a profound way. The RM is a formalism
> > that systematically applies predicate logic to the task of managing
> > data. OO is an ad hoc computational model based on an arbitrary set of
> > features useful for creating large unpredictable state machines out of
> > small predictable state machines.
> > ...
>
> I think it would be a public service to re-post this weekly. It seems
> to me an appropriate reply to oh so many of the posts here. I suppose
> it could be done automatically ala your plonk mechanism but that would
> only invite the triflers to do the same, so perhaps the personal
> approach remains best.
>
> p
While I agree with the general thematics guiding the above description of RM vs OO, I would like to draw your attention on the danger of locking up RM in an elitist bias.

That is fundamentally the reason, I will always oppose approaches of RM that are primarily based on negation (*plonking*, *cranking* or whatever segregational attitudes) of anything else. When you look at BB's, Marshall, Keith's Duggar attitude into this board you will realize soon that they do not bring anything or little to RM cause but intidimidation, judgment and power driven hyppocrit selfish motives.

They are the first to accuse people of intellectual dishonnesty when they display tons of it at every corner...How can such incoherence not hurt RM? Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 18:28:57 CET