Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:19:48 GMT
Message-ID: <80grg.7207$pu3.160733_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


B Faux wrote:

> Dmitry;
>
> Save yourself some time (may be too late) - take a look at
> www.intersystems.com the "cache" DB is based on the old MUMPS DBMS which was
> supposedly a 'node-based' data storage and retrieval system first developed
> for medical applications (like neural networks?)
>
> As Mr. Badour has said elsewhere in this thread (more than once) - you may
> be "plowing old ground." Cache already supports everything you have listed
> that you do, but it also has multiple users, multiple threads, transaction
> triggers, SQL query support, and lots more; all without tables - but not
> compliant with strict RM rules (but what is?)
>
> BFaux

Are you nuts? The RM doesn't have rules for network model dbmses. That's what the network model is for. Received on Fri Jul 07 2006 - 00:19:48 CEST

Original text of this message