Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nf3.bellglobal.com!ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Bob Badour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.databases.theory Subject: Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside References: <1151665732.555787.99350@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1151740631.102273.281450@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151921958.158158.310910@a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1151947251.883285.47990@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151948683.152997.326210@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1152116943.522272.5220@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1152128550.212098.266230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <%8erg.60479$Lm5.18587@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> In-Reply-To: <%8erg.60479$Lm5.18587@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 19 Message-ID: <80grg.7207$pu3.160733@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:19:48 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.176.114.26 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aliant.net X-Trace: ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca 1152224388 142.176.114.26 (Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:19:48 ADT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:19:48 ADT Organization: Sympatico-Subscriber Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases:48075 comp.databases.theory:43130 B Faux wrote: > Dmitry; > > Save yourself some time (may be too late) - take a look at > www.intersystems.com the "cache" DB is based on the old MUMPS DBMS which was > supposedly a 'node-based' data storage and retrieval system first developed > for medical applications (like neural networks?) > > As Mr. Badour has said elsewhere in this thread (more than once) - you may > be "plowing old ground." Cache already supports everything you have listed > that you do, but it also has multiple users, multiple threads, transaction > triggers, SQL query support, and lots more; all without tables - but not > compliant with strict RM rules (but what is?) > > BFaux Are you nuts? The RM doesn't have rules for network model dbmses. That's what the network model is for.