Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
From: Rene de Visser <Rene_de_Visser_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:32:58 +0100
Message-ID: <co2r5d$5v7$00$1_at_news.t-online.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:32:58 +0100
Message-ID: <co2r5d$5v7$00$1_at_news.t-online.com>
"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:41a4e1b0.30883453_at_news.wanadoo.es...
>>, ie. "a relation cannot be a
>>type", if I understand you right ?
>
> This is true, but this is not the same as you said above.
In the relational programming language AP5, a type is simply a relation of
arity 1.
i.e. types are a special case of relations.
Rene. Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 21:32:58 CET