Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
From: Alfredo Novoa <anovoa_at_ncs.es>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:30:42 +0100
Message-ID: <qbv9q0trk6nrno44af8r854bue0essjgl9_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:30:42 +0100
Message-ID: <qbv9q0trk6nrno44af8r854bue0essjgl9_at_4ax.com>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:32:58 +0100, "Rene de Visser"
<Rene_de_Visser_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>> This is true, but this is not the same as you said above.
>In the relational programming language AP5, a type is simply a relation of
>arity 1.
Then it is a poorly designed language.
Regards Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 22:30:42 CET