Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:48:49 +0100
Message-ID: <419f04f4$0$270$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:48:49 +0100
Message-ID: <419f04f4$0$270$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>
"Jan Hidders" ...
> Ja Lar wrote:
<snip>
>> Are you are referring to the model that allows an attribute to be of a
>> relational type-domain ...
>
> Not exactly. I'm referring to the model where if you have have a
> relational variable Person you can then use "Person" as a type for your
> columns. That's what it means to use relational variables as types.
In fact, that whas exactly what I ment by "an attribute of a relational type
domain".
(column type = domain)
Received on Sat Nov 20 2004 - 09:48:49 CET