Re: Demo: Modelling Cost of Travel Paths Between Towns

> YOU have absolutely NO IDEA what you are talking about. I have less and less
> respect for you as time goes on. PA is not redundant. If the exact same row
> (all attributes) were stored twice, there would be redundancy. According to
> your MIS-interpretation, PA would be stored once in, say, a STATES table,
> along with some state_id, say 31 for PA, and the number 31 would be stored
> multiple times in the data tables to represent PA. But then 31 is redundant
> by your bizzare thought process. Either that, or there can only be one row
> for all towns in PA. You make no sense. Does not speak well for Xdb.

My apologies, I lost context of the thread and assumed the PAs were added in the one-table presented by Mr Celko. If towns are stored in a separate table and linked to Celko's main table, then there would no longer be redundant towns. Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 22:42:40 CET