Re: Demo: Modelling Cost of Travel Paths Between Towns
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:37:50 +0100
Message-ID: <448ip0lvrjs2lbe7o3lp9m3detemqh6b1e_at_4ax.com>
On 15 Nov 2004 12:31:09 -0800, Neo wrote:
>> > OT "A Normalization Question", which you were a significant contributor
>>
>> I posted a total of 8 messages in that 341 message thread.
>
>My apologies. Similar issues were discussed in OT "Nearest Common
>Ancestor Report" to which you were the main contributor.
Hi Neo,
Wrong again. Google reports 83 messages by me and 117 messages by you in that thread. Of course, if we extract the many repostings of the exact same messages, I would become the main contributor.
>> > how the logical layer of a data model is
>> > implemented at the hardware level is irrelevant.
>>
>> Yes, Neo, I know that...
>
>Then why do you keep bring up hardware bits with respect to
>redundancies at the logical layer of data modelling?
Because I'm trying to show that dabbling over storing the same letter or the same word twicce in a database is exactly as nonsensical as dabbling over storing a string of bits twice.
Oh, but why do I still bother. Everyone else in this group is surely smart enough to know this without me having to point it out. And you are clearly not smart enough to ever understand this simple point. Or maybe you are, but you'll never admit it as that would cost you $1000.
Good bye. Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 22:37:50 CET
