Re: foundations of relational theory?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:14:01 -0500
Message-ID: <Ahudnc9Z268UyAGiU-KYhg_at_golden.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:14:01 -0500
Message-ID: <Ahudnc9Z268UyAGiU-KYhg_at_golden.net>
"andrewst" <member14183_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message news:3524528.1067193300_at_dbforums.com...
> > Originally posted by Ross Ferris > > > If the data were stored in a multi-valued database, or even an XML > > > data store, then the redundant data could be removed. > > > > > <RESPONSE> > > <SENTENCE> > > <WORD>Right.</WORD> > > <WORD>No</WORD> > > <WORD>redundancy</WORD> > > <WORD>in</WORD> > > <WORD>XML</WORD> > > <WORD>after</WORD> > > <WORD>all</WORD> > > <EMOTICON>;o)</EMOTICON> > > </SENTENCE> > > </RESPONSE>
Just to pick a nit, I think the above should really be:
<RESPONSE>
<FRAGMENT>
</FRAGMENT>
<FRAGMENT>
<WORD>in</WORD>
</FRAGMENT>
</RESPONSE>
or alternatively:
<RESPONSE>
<FRAGMENT>
</FRAGMENT>
<SENTENCE>
<WORD>is</WORD>
<WORD>in</WORD>
</SENTENCE>
</RESPONSE>
Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 00:14:01 CET
