Re: foundations of relational theory?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:14:01 -0500
Message-ID: <Ahudnc9Z268UyAGiU-KYhg_at_golden.net>


"andrewst" <member14183_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message news:3524528.1067193300_at_dbforums.com...

>
> Originally posted by Ross Ferris
>
> > If the data were stored in a multi-valued database, or even an XML
>
> > data store, then the redundant data could be removed.
>
> >
>
> <RESPONSE>
>
> <SENTENCE>
>
> <WORD>Right.</WORD>
>
> <WORD>No</WORD>
>
> <WORD>redundancy</WORD>
>
> <WORD>in</WORD>
>
> <WORD>XML</WORD>
>
> <WORD>after</WORD>
>
> <WORD>all</WORD>
>
> <EMOTICON>;o)</EMOTICON>
>
> </SENTENCE>
>
> </RESPONSE>

Just to pick a nit, I think the above should really be:

<RESPONSE>

<FRAGMENT>

<WORD>Right.</WORD>

</FRAGMENT>

<FRAGMENT>

<WORD>No</WORD>

<WORD>redundancy</WORD>

<WORD>in</WORD>

<WORD>XML</WORD>

<WORD>after</WORD>

<WORD>all</WORD>

<EMOTICON>;o)</EMOTICON>

</FRAGMENT>

</RESPONSE>

or alternatively:

<RESPONSE>

<FRAGMENT>

<WORD>Right.</WORD>

</FRAGMENT>

<SENTENCE>

<WORD>There</WORD>

<WORD>is</WORD>

<WORD>no</WORD>

<WORD>redundancy</WORD>

<WORD>in</WORD>

<WORD>XML</WORD>

<WORD>after</WORD>

<WORD>all</WORD>

<EMOTICON>;o)</EMOTICON>

</SENTENCE>

</RESPONSE>
Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 00:14:01 CET

Original text of this message