Re: Oracle 9i/9iAS co-existense question

From: J. W. <someone_at_comcast.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:13:23 GMT
Message-ID: <omurgv83b4g8ptn3uvolqs1gnjqn7kvf68_at_4ax.com>


On 10 Jul 2003 09:53:39 -0700, bigjobbies_at_hotmail.com (Ethel Aardvark) wrote:

>I had them installed on the same W2K box working quite happily. (If
>you use iFS there can be version issues, but I do not think this is a
>"one box" issue.)
>
>I then realised that I did not actually need the database installed
>separately, so I now just use the DB which is part of the AS
>installation. This means much better use of memory and CPU resources
>and is quite permitted according to the terms of my license agreement.
>
>ETA
The database installed with 9iAS is for the 9iAS repository. It really shouldn't be treated as a typical Oracle installation as we know it, that is installed via the Oracle9i database CDs, because of the requirements and restrictions that 9iAS has on it.

It does work, though...

Cheers... Received on Fri Jul 11 2003 - 02:13:23 CEST

Original text of this message