Re: Technical (not lame) comparison between Oracle 8i on NT & Oracle 8i on Linux

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 06:03:29 GMT
Message-ID: <ReIta.750370$L1.213679_at_sccrnsc02>


Compare the two OS's. Linux seems to require less hardware for the same performance in general when compared to an MS Windows environment. Oracle itself isn;t going to work differently; it is going to run differently depending upon the OS performance. (IO rates, CPU efficiencie, etc.) Jim

-- 
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family.  Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign.  You can figure
it out.
"kkarma" <kkarma_at_eudoramail.com> wrote in message
news:7770e62f.0305051951.bb1ce7c_at_posting.google.com...

> I'm interested in making a true comparison (not subjective religious)
> between the Oracle 8i on NT and Oracle 8i on Linux performance of an
> app that I developed, but I don't know which Oracle's settings must I
> see and change to ensure that the dbms instance on NT is on equal
> conditions to the dbms instance on Linux.
> My app is running as a Win9x client but relies on many stored
> procedures on the DB side, the app measures the time of its work.
> The instances for comparing are installed on the same machine in this
> way:
> 1)Windows NT Server 4.0(Backoffice) with Oracle 8i (8.1.7) Enterprise
> Edition.
> 2)RedHat 6.2 (Kernel 2.4) with Oracle 8i (8.1.7) Enterprise Edition.
Received on Tue May 06 2003 - 08:03:29 CEST

Original text of this message