Re: Double Encryption Illegal?

"Trevor L. Jackson, III" <fullmoon_at_aspi.net> wrote in message news:39CA7F34.31E17A43_at_aspi.net...
> Frog2000 wrote:
>
> > OK then, what is this file?
> >
> > "Trevor L. Jackson, III" <fullmoon_at_aspi.net> wrote in message
> > news:39CA3454.26893D21_at_aspi.net...
> > > John Myre wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guy Macon wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > Oh, *real* clever, Arturo. Did you think that nobody would notice
> > > > > you double encrypting your post using ROT13? Well *I* noticed,
 and
> > > > > I double DEcrypted it with ROT13 bnefor replying. So there!
> > > >
> > > > "bnefor"?
> > > >
> > > > I think there is a bug in your ROT13 implementation.
> > >
> > > These things are to be expected from a probabilistic decryption
 system.
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > 'Ñ)iæ#OO-Í¿12NBä!Gò3,~ºÖ®ý.zmØ z°²=dW
>
> Looks a lot like a multi unicode character sequence that has been
 encrypted
> with Rot-257.
>
> When you offer gibberish and ask for more, what are you likely to get?
>
It was the message I respnded to, encrypted. Received on Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST