Re: Double Encryption Illegal?

From: Guy Macon <guymacon_at_deltanet.com>
Date: 2000/09/21
Message-ID: <8qc9s7$q60_at_dispatch.concentric.net>#1/1


Arturo wrote:
>
>On 20 Sep 2000 02:13:48 GMT, guymacon_at_deltanet.com (Guy Macon) wrote:
>
>>Trevor L. Jackson, III wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Guy Macon wrote:
>>>
>>>> You mean I shouldn't be applying ROT-13 twice? Several experts have
>>>> told me that applying ROT-13 twice is *so* secure that an attacker
>>>> with infinite resourses can't even tell what algorithm I used...
>>>
>>>They also can't tell which of the four combinations DD, DE, ED,
>>>or EE were used.
>>
>>Who could possibly ask for more security than that???
>
>Hope nobody is taking you guys seriously ;-)

Oh, *real* clever, Arturo. Did you think that nobody would notice you double encrypting your post using ROT13? Well *I* noticed, and I double DEcrypted it with ROT13 bnefor replying. So there! Received on Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message