Re: SQL*Plus replacement available - SPAM SPAM SPAM

Ulrich Kobsa wrote:

>
> btw: a real spammer would hardly be impressed by such answers.
>

In one sense you are correct in another sense you are not. Look at the way these spammers recoil in horror that someone has pointed out how rude they are.

Look at how these spammers attempt to legitimize their spamming through some pretext such as ... "I'm not charging for it ... today".

Look at how these spammers refuse to do the simple thing which would be to apologize and repost.

If they weren't hypocrites and spammers they would just say "Oops" and do as they've been asked. Their measure of contrived outrage is proof that they are intentionally spamming.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)