Help!!!!!!!!! GPF in Developer/2000(Forms 4.5)

From: Harvey Mark <IMCEAMS-EARTH_PO1_msmrh>
Date: 1997/12/08
Message-ID: <14D46DF9FC08D111AF8700805F68C0CF04D6E1_at_CONNERY>#1/1


        I have to agree with Gerard, GPF free, was that an Oracle salesman !!!

        I have found that the best route is to ditch 3.11, it's rubbish, upgrade to NT

        and get the latest version of DEV2000. Also buy as much RAM as possible.

        You might want to get the latest "patches" from Oracle also - they arrive

        by post on about 10 floppy disks ( really ).

        I am running 3.51 and it's a massive improvement on 3.11. I have also tried

        NT 4.0 but some of the OLE stuff now seems to have broken.         

                Mark Harvey.

> ----------
> From: Gerard H. Pille[SMTP:ghp_at_santens.be]
> Posted At: 05 December 1997 11:02
> Posted To: tools
> Conversation: Help!!!!!!!!! GPF in Developer/2000(Forms 4.5)
> Subject: Re: Help!!!!!!!!! GPF in Developer/2000(Forms 4.5)
>
> You wonna bet?
> --
> ------------
> Kind reGards
> \ / |
> X |
> / \ x
> Gerard
>
> Jorge Meirim <No_Spam_at_Thank.you> schreef in artikel
> <668l34$oq$1_at_internet-gw.telecom.pt>...
> > Upgrade you version of FORMS/REPORTS/GRAPHICS/PROC_BUILDER, I mean
 DEV 2K
> > from version 1.2 to version 1.3 or even to 2.0 available from
 1/DEC/97.
> >
> > The new versions are GPF free.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > J.Meirim
> >
> > In article <881312324.24801_at_dejanews.com>, rajs_at_meghdoot.mastek.com
> > says...
> > >
> > >Hi Everybody, Please help me!!!!!! We are encountering a lot of
 GPFs
> > >while running an application developed in Forms4.5 and Reports 2.5.
 I am
> > >unable to trace the cause for it. Is it a normal phenomenon? Are
 there
> > >any tools available which can help me find the cause of GPFs? Any
 info
 or
> > >pointers will be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > >Thanks in advance
> > >Rajs
> > >
> > >-------------------==== Posted via Deja News

 ====-----------------------

> > > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
> >
> >
>
Received on Mon Dec 08 1997 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message