Re: POSSREPs as union types
Date: 02 Sep 2009 21:51:10 GMT
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>rp_at_raampje.(none) (Reinier Post) wrote:
>>>I had a though about possreps the other day, and I wanted to post
>>>it, for no particular reason. This thought is not much developed,
>>>so don't expect much. :-)
>>It would help if you stated your ideas in terms that don't require
>>the whole-sale purchase of C. Date's books in order to be appreciated.
>>(This is not intended as a comment on the usefulness of your idea.
>>Just a comment that I don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.)
> Well, then you probably ought to read a book or two.
I have. I'm not impressed with their overall quality.
-- ReinierReceived on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 16:51:10 CDT