Re: POSSREPs as union types
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:42:52 -0700
Message-ID: <46tt9557n4fq4vumu6g6rcvkmlemmu1feb_at_4ax.com>
rp_at_raampje.(none) (Reinier Post) wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>>rp_at_raampje.(none) (Reinier Post) wrote:
>>
>>>Marshall wrote:
>>>
>>>>I had a though about possreps the other day, and I wanted to post
>>>>it, for no particular reason. This thought is not much developed,
>>>>so don't expect much. :-)
>>>
>>>It would help if you stated your ideas in terms that don't require
>>>the whole-sale purchase of C. Date's books in order to be appreciated.
>>>(This is not intended as a comment on the usefulness of your idea.
>>>Just a comment that I don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.)
>>
>> Well, then you probably ought to read a book or two.
>
>I have. I'm not impressed with their overall quality.
What? So bad that you could not even pick up a few definitions?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Thu Sep 03 2009 - 00:42:52 CEST