Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:42:33 -0700
Message-ID: <b1h035p3rvl81iall6v03td99m7jaonelf_at_4ax.com>
David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>On Jun 11, 12:47 am, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
>> David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
[snip]
>> >This is clearly intended to mock, and in a nasty way. It is typical of
>>
>> Is it? I read it as "If you start at the beginning, you will
>> find what you are looking for." Sometimes, just getting started can
>> be the biggest hurdle.
>
>It's the same message, but that's the polite version. Bob's version
>was offensive. It suggested the OP was so dumb he needed to be told
>in detail how to read a book from the beginning.
When someone has a book, has not started it, and is still asking questions, what is the next thing to do? Start reading the book perhaps?
>> Too many are after the magic incantation. There is no substitute
>> for sitting down and studying.
>
>Completely agree.
Which is likely why Bob stated what he did.
>> >BB. Perhaps BB could himself do with some suggestions for reading
>> >material - books with titles like "How to win friends and influence
>> >people".
>>
>> Is your statement intended to mock, and in a nasty way?
>
>Yes, obviously. I have no problem mocking a bully.
Well, you are getting rather pugnacious. I suppose I could declare you a bully and then start mocking you. That presupposes that I consider your activity acceptable. I do not.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Thu Jun 11 2009 - 01:42:33 CEST