Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:24:11 -0300
Message-ID: <4a2f194e$0$23784$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
paul c wrote:
> David BL wrote: > ... >
>> This is clearly intended to mock, and in a nasty way. It is typical of
>> BB. Perhaps BB could himself do with some suggestions for reading
>> material - books with titles like "How to win friends and influence
>> people".
Given I already have friends and I already influence people, I have no use for Carnegie's recipes for intellectual dishonesty. I suggest that's more appropriate reading for the snake oil salesmen and self-aggrandizing ignorants.
>> Of course Reinier was also mocking various regulars in the newsgroup.
>> However, I found his comment quite amusing - and nothing like BB's
>> aggressive tone. BB's reaction also suggests lack of balance.
Or blunt honesty. Twits like Reinier and David are predisposed to see whatever fantasy they want to see in any case.
> Maybe you should count yourself lucky that you didn't get called for > suggesting a paradox could ever be a foundation, aka DVA's!
I count myself lucky that my news reader has a twit filter. Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 04:24:11 CEST