Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?

From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2fc95e53-ac9b-42b6-a5ce-3e54e5da2a35_at_n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>


On Jun 10, 10:10 am, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> David BL wrote:
> > On Jun 10, 9:44 am, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> >> David BL wrote:
>
> >> ...
>
> >>> This is clearly intended to mock, and in a nasty way. It is typical of
> >>> BB.  Perhaps BB could himself do with some suggestions for reading
> >>> material - books with titles like "How to win friends and influence
> >>> people".
> >>> Of course Reinier was also mocking various regulars in the newsgroup.
> >>> However, I found his comment quite amusing - and nothing like BB's
> >>> aggressive tone.  BB's reaction also suggests lack of balance.
> >> Maybe you should count yourself lucky that you didn't get called for
> >> suggesting a paradox could ever be a foundation, aka DVA's!
>
> > What paradox would that be?
>
> Russell's.

I know Russel's paradox. What has that got to do with it? Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 04:18:28 CEST

Original text of this message