comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 01:05:43 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Gene Wirchenko (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 01:33:00 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 09:19:35 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 10:12:03 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 22:43:19 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:31:14 CST)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Walter Mitty (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 07:14:46 CST)
Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 18:13:09 CST)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 18:18:21 CST)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 18:14:00 CST)
  - Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 19:30:56 CST)
    - Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 09:02:14 CST)
      - Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 12:59:00 CST)
        
        Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:42:03 CST)
        
        Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:14:57 CST)
        
        Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 19:34:56 CST)
        
        Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 21:20:41 CST)
EISWT-09 call for papers john (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 12:00:32 CST)
Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Keith H Duggar (Sat Jan 03 2009 - 17:02:07 CST)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer JOG (Sat Jan 03 2009 - 21:27:20 CST)
  - Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Bob Badour (Sat Jan 03 2009 - 23:25:41 CST)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Gene Wirchenko (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 00:49:07 CST)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Keith H Duggar (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 21:54:30 CST)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 11:03:22 CST)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 12:40:41 CST)
DBMS recommendation? JuergenRiemer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 04:10:13 CST)
- Re: DBMS recommendation? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 07:53:37 CST)
- Re: DBMS recommendation? JuergenRiemer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 08:41:06 CST)
a union is always a join! paul c (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 15:56:27 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! Brian Selzer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 23:14:17 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 13:40:33 CST)
  - Re: a union is always a join! paul c (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 16:45:26 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! Brian Selzer (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 21:35:12 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! rpost (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 13:21:59 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 16:05:55 CST)
  - Re: a union is always a join! paul c (Fri Jan 30 2009 - 14:18:04 CST)
- Re: a union is always a join! compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 23:05:18 CST)
CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 05:12:33 CST)
Biology Informatics Databases Search Engine VADLO.com Rb (Sun Jan 11 2009 - 00:03:05 CST)
Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Taras_96 (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 05:10:28 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Cimode (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 05:34:34 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 12:49:05 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Taras_96 (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 05:46:08 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search paul c (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 08:56:26 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Walter Mitty (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 09:34:33 CST)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 15:06:15 CST)
How would I do this sub-select? dan_at_nospam.com (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 09:49:32 CST)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 10:08:51 CST)
  - Re: How would I do this sub-select? dan_at_nospam.com (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 11:05:38 CST)
    - Re: How would I do this sub-select? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 11:56:17 CST)
      - Re: How would I do this sub-select? dan_at_nospam.com (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:11:34 CST)
      - Re: How would I do this sub-select? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:26:24 CST)
        
        Re: How would I do this sub-select? dan_at_nospam.com (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 13:00:57 CST)
CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo (Thu Jan 15 2009 - 04:41:21 CST)
How to save in database binary tree values kashi (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 04:19:46 CST)
how to design database for binary tree kashi (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 04:26:12 CST)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree Ed Prochak (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 15:15:21 CST)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree -CELKO- (Wed Jan 21 2009 - 08:05:57 CST)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree kashi (Tue Jan 27 2009 - 05:17:23 CST)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jan 27 2009 - 22:50:22 CST)
Call for Papers: Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing Conferences, July 13-16, 2009, USA, WORLDCOMP'09 A. M. G. Solo (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 08:18:03 CST)
Best way to design table to store attributes? carl.henthorn_at_gmail.com (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 14:35:07 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 14:53:31 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? carl.henthorn_at_gmail.com (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 18:18:13 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? Brian Selzer (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 18:58:26 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 14:27:59 CST)
  - Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? paul c (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 22:26:10 CST)
    - Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? Bob Badour (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 12:57:09 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 14:39:41 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? -CELKO- (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 10:26:56 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 15:44:16 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? David BL (Sun Jan 25 2009 - 19:22:34 CST)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jan 27 2009 - 22:48:28 CST)
Design question Mark S. (UK) (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 10:23:26 CST)
- Re: Design question Mark S. (UK) (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 11:03:52 CST)
  - Re: Design question Bob Badour (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 12:14:38 CST)
    - Re: Design question Mark S. (UK) (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 13:01:20 CST)
      - Re: Design question Bob Badour (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 13:55:55 CST)
  - Re: Design question Bob Badour (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 12:17:59 CST)
For All your FREE GIS Data needs... webmaster_at_spatial-hydro.com (Sun Jan 25 2009 - 01:17:25 CST)
***2009 Salford Data Mining Conference - San Diego, CA*** Aaron Adams (Mon Jan 26 2009 - 13:20:34 CST)
How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Ted Byers (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 14:10:34 CST)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Hugo Kornelis (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 15:53:13 CST)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? toby (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 15:57:46 CST)
  - Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? toby (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 15:58:27 CST)
  - Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? -CELKO- (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 09:21:22 CST)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 16:11:01 CST)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Philipp Post (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 05:10:21 CST)
  - Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 08:29:55 CST)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Ted Byers (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 11:00:42 CST)
Re: Ankeriaspornoa Auno Saari (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 03:10:21 CST)
Earn Online, Want to know how? imbiz40_at_gmail.com (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 06:47:31 CST)
Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Walter Mitty (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 07:39:15 CST)

Last message date: Fri Jan 30 2009 - 14:18:04 CST
Archived on: Fri Jan 30 2009 - 14:42:33 CST

93 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]