- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer salmobytes (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 01:47:51 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Bob Badour (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 02:46:05 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 08:05:43 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Gene Wirchenko (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 08:33:00 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Keith H Duggar (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 00:02:07 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer JOG (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 04:27:20 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Gene Wirchenko (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 07:49:07 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 16:19:35 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints paul c (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 17:12:03 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Keith H Duggar (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 04:54:30 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 05:43:19 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! Brian Selzer (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:14:17 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:31:14 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 18:03:22 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 19:40:41 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! rpost (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 20:40:33 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! Brian Selzer (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 04:35:12 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Walter Mitty (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 14:14:46 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! rpost (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 20:21:59 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 01:14:00 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Taras_96 (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:46:08 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search paul c (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 15:56:26 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Walter Mitty (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 16:34:33 CET)
- CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo (Thu Jan 15 2009 - 11:41:21 CET)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree -CELKO- (Wed Jan 21 2009 - 15:05:57 CET)
- Call for Papers: Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing Conferences, July 13-16, 2009, USA, WORLDCOMP'09 A. M. G. Solo (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 15:18:03 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? carl.henthorn_at_gmail.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 01:18:13 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? Brian Selzer (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 01:58:26 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 21:27:59 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 21:39:41 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 22:06:15 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? -CELKO- (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 17:26:56 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? patrick61z_at_yahoo.com (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 22:44:16 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? David BL (Mon Jan 26 2009 - 02:22:34 CET)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree kashi (Tue Jan 27 2009 - 12:17:23 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? DBMS_Plumber (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 05:48:28 CET)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree DBMS_Plumber (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 05:50:22 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Philipp Post (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 12:10:21 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Walter Mitty (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 14:39:15 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? -CELKO- (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 16:21:22 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Ted Byers (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 18:00:42 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 23:05:55 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Jan 30 2009 - 06:05:18 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 paul c (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 01:13:09 CET)
- EISWT-09 call for papers john (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 19:00:32 CET)
- DBMS recommendation? JuergenRiemer (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 11:10:13 CET)
- a union is always a join! paul c (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 22:56:27 CET)
- CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 12:12:33 CET)
- Biology Informatics Databases Search Engine VADLO.com Rb (Sun Jan 11 2009 - 07:03:05 CET)
- Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search Taras_96 (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 12:10:28 CET)
- How would I do this sub-select? dan_at_nospam.com (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 16:49:32 CET)
- How to save in database binary tree values kashi (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 11:19:46 CET)
- how to design database for binary tree kashi (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 11:26:12 CET)
- Best way to design table to store attributes? carl.henthorn_at_gmail.com (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 21:35:07 CET)
- Design question Mark S. (UK) (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 17:23:26 CET)
- For All your FREE GIS Data needs... webmaster_at_spatial-hydro.com (Sun Jan 25 2009 - 08:17:25 CET)
- ***2009 Salford Data Mining Conference - San Diego, CA*** Aaron Adams (Mon Jan 26 2009 - 20:20:34 CET)
- How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? Ted Byers (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 21:10:34 CET)
- Re: Ankeriaspornoa Auno Saari (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 10:10:21 CET)
- Earn Online, Want to know how? imbiz40_at_gmail.com (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 13:47:31 CET)
- Last message date: Fri Jan 30 2009 - 21:18:04 CET
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 23:55:17 CEST
|