Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:20:50 -0800
Message-ID: <jer0t313e3622viki469k3cmh34korlagv@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:20:50 -0800
Message-ID: <jer0t313e3622viki469k3cmh34korlagv@4ax.com>
Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 6, 12:09 pm, Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nos..._at_hotmail.com>
>wrote:
[snip]
>> - it maps (almost) 1 to 1 to machine code
>What is mapping 1:1 between machine code and assembler. Tis the first
>time I hear somebody establishing cardinality between 2 languages.
>What a bunch of crap.
Nope. Most assembler instructions translate to one machine instruction each. That is the mapping that is being referred to. It is not perfect as there are pseudo-ops and macros, but it holds in general.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 16:20:50 CST
