Re: Object-relational impedence

On 6 mar, 22:20, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
[Snipped]
> Nope. Most assembler instructions translate to one machine
> instruction each. That is the mapping that is being referred to. It
> is not perfect as there are pseudo-ops and macros, but it holds in
> general.
So ? I am not blaming the *mapping* but rather the entire sloppy reasonning behind. (Water has oxygen, we breethe oxygen, therefore we could breethe water.)

Do you think that the fact a physical *mov* is physicaly matching an ram adress memory content the content of another is sufficient to state an overgeneralized and simplyistic conclusion that

• just as assembler "mismatches" objects so objects "mismatch" relations *

Nothing but an simplyistic attempt to draw a vague abstract from a physical behavior when using assembler.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
> Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
> I have preferences.
> You have biases.
> He/She has prejudices.
Received on Sat Mar 08 2008 - 15:33:45 CET