Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:27:58 -0800 (PST), topmind wrote:
> > Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:05 +0000, Eric wrote:
> >>> On 2008-03-04, Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> >>> I don't believe that merely using an RDBMS will solve all problems. What
> >>> I meant was that, accepting what David said above, if you keep your data
> >>> in an RDBMS, it will be easily available for the solution of any
> >>> possible problem that can be solved using that data.
> >> No, this as well is wrong. Keeping "data" in RDBMS puts certain
> >> restrictions on what can be stored there and how it can be used later.
> > A RDMBS
> > cannot stop you from doing anything you want to with retrieved data.
> Yes, exactly this is wrong.
Is this turning into a strong-typing debate? I am not here to debate types. I am a dynamic/no-typing fan (although they do have their domains where they have a net benefit).
> (I hope you don't have in mind retrieving all
> content and continuing without RDBMS.)
> Dmitry A. Kazakov
-T- Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 22:00:02 CET