Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <mxhen94gvbi1$.ezbsw0aflk36$.dlg_at_40tude.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <mxhen94gvbi1$.ezbsw0aflk36$.dlg_at_40tude.net>
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:27:58 -0800 (PST), topmind wrote:
> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:05 +0000, Eric wrote:
>>
>>> On 2008-03-04, Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't believe that merely using an RDBMS will solve all problems. What
>>> I meant was that, accepting what David said above, if you keep your data
>>> in an RDBMS, it will be easily available for the solution of any
>>> possible problem that can be solved using that data.
>>
>> No, this as well is wrong. Keeping "data" in RDBMS puts certain
>> restrictions on what can be stored there and how it can be used later.
[...]
> A RDMBS
> cannot stop you from doing anything you want to with retrieved data.
-- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.deReceived on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 11:08:32 CET