Re: Mixing OO and DB

From: topmind <topmind_at_technologist.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <89130d89-e56a-4bd3-a9a8-c0270f98f8f1_at_e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>


Robert Martin wrote:
> On 2008-02-29 19:47:17 -0600, topmind <topmind_at_technologist.com> said:
>
> > But nobody agrees on what "good" OOP is or why/if Java is "bad". Good
> > OO is at the end of the rainbow, never under our microscopes.
>
> This is equivalent to the argument used by some supporters of
> Intelligent Design, that "evolutionists" don't agree on the mechanisms
> of evolution.
>
> It is true that there is a significant amount of controversy and
> disagreement in OO circles. So what? There is also a rather large
> body of agreement.

Yeah, that "relational sucks" and 60's navigational should be resurrected from the grave and wrapped with bloaty set/get's.

> --
> Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob)��| email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com
> Object Mentor Inc.� � � � � ��| blog:��www.butunclebob.com

-T- Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 18:28:15 CET

Original text of this message