Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:27:46 -0000
Message-ID: <xb6dnbExx5qOqFHanZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d_at_pipex.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:27:46 -0000
Message-ID: <xb6dnbExx5qOqFHanZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d_at_pipex.net>
"JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:0cd61579-0f26-422c-9aec-908ffdea59ff_at_i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 3, 2:07 pm, Thomas Gagne <tga..._at_wide-open-west.com> wrote:
> One thing I would like to avoid
> (outside of almost flames of course), is the notion that database
> technology is merely a persistence layer (do people still actually
> think that?)
Are you kidding?!! You will grow old and die before you find someone not on c.d.t. who DOESN'T think that. In the real world you will be thought some kind of simpleton/troll/nutcase if you suggest it isn't just a persistence layer.
Roy Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 18:27:46 CET