Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

From: Daniel Parker <danielaparker_at_gmail.com>
Date: 14 Mar 2007 08:37:43 -0700
Message-ID: <1173886663.886078.116430@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>


On Mar 14, 9:15 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> The word "object" is essentially meaningless. It has no clear definition
> and gets used to mean a variety of things. Those who use it frequently
> do so to impede communication.- Hide quoted text -
>

Well, the statement "instance of an ADT" is not meaningless (it can be expressed axiomatically), and that is probably the clearest definition of "object". Admititly there is a residual of what could be described as "mystery OO", but it appears to be vanishing with the passage of time.

Regards,
Daniel Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 10:37:43 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US