Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 14 Mar 2007 07:05:04 -0700
Message-ID: <1173881103.349724.261970_at_l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com>


On Mar 14, 2:36 pm, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dmitry Shuklin" <shuk..._at_bk.ru> wrote in message
>
> news:1173876283.546590.57250_at_l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 13 อมา, 20:42, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
[Snipped nonsense]
> > This is categorically true.
> > All today successfull programming languages have pointers or
> > references.
> > Many of today successfull RDB projects have surrogate identifiers (=
> > pointers emulation)
>
> Surrogate indentifiers are NOT pointers emulation.
>
> Let's clear up this misconception before proceeding.
You shall soon realize you are arguing with a somebody who has no clue about the difference between the two concepts. Best thing to do is to ignore his comments... Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 15:05:04 CET

Original text of this message