Re: Table/Attribute Modeling

From: Tony D <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net>
Date: 14 Mar 2007 07:14:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1173881640.443335.253970_at_e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>


On Mar 14, 1:07 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 1:03 pm, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "mAsterdam" <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
>
> >news:45f71197$0$325$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
>
> > > Walt wrote:
> > > > -CELKO- wrote:
> > > >> LOL! Larry Constantine used beat up on Software Engineers for saying
> > > >> "methodology" instead of "method" because methodology is the study of
> > > >> methods and not one in particular. He also had a great definition: "A
> > > >> method is what you do next when you don't known what to do next." --
> > > >> very practical!
>
> > > > The same "word inflation" was used when "technology" began to be used
> > where
> > > > "technique" would have been more apropos.
>
> > > So it is T/A P then? P for Paradigm, of course.
>
> > Of course, the greatest methodology of them all is "Structured Hierarchical
> > Information Technology". The acronym is left as an exercise for the reader.
>
> I disagree....;)
>
> You are not making this sexy enough...Something like
>
> Structural Hierarchical-XML Information Technology would be more
> fitting...Check out my description for guidelines into creating buzz
> words
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/tree/browse_frm/...

OK, I've been reading some OO stuff so feel up for the challenge ! How's about :

Fully Updateable XML Object Relational Enterprise Data

Or you would be, if you tried it ;)

  • Tony
Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 15:14:00 CET

Original text of this message