Re: Objects and Relations
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:43:53 GMT
Message-ID: <tVOAh.986042$5R2.538021_at_pd7urf3no>
>
>
> The phrase is "intents and purposes". And "look the same"
> hardly encompasses all the facts we can state (see below).
> ...
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:43:53 GMT
Message-ID: <tVOAh.986042$5R2.538021_at_pd7urf3no>
Keith H Duggar wrote:
> David BL wrote:
> ...
>>An interesting question is whether we try to distinguish >>pieces that for all intensive purposes look the same.
>
>
> The phrase is "intents and purposes". And "look the same"
> hardly encompasses all the facts we can state (see below).
> ...
Heh, looks like the Rev. Spooner is alive and well at c.d.t. So fitting too as half the posts here are based on faith. I would like to see a glossary of c.d.t. spoonerisms. Right now, the only one my feeble memory contains has nothing to do with c.d.t (but then again, maybe a good spoonerism would have nothing to do with anything). this one came from former mother-in-law who was an unwitting master of them - she was very fond of Elizabeth Beaten furniture.
p Received on Thu Feb 15 2007 - 02:43:53 CET