Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:53:28 GMT
Message-ID: <cxtqg.5989$pu3.136857_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Well, a jackhammer can probably drive nails into a piece of wood, too.
> That doesn't mean it's the right tool for that job.
>
> Good luck with your research, in any case! Innovation pushes things
> forward. But not all innovation results in the technology we think it
> will.
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:53:28 GMT
Message-ID: <cxtqg.5989$pu3.136857_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Bill Karwin wrote:
>> But i really belive that far future belongs to network databases, not to >> table-based.
>
> Well, a jackhammer can probably drive nails into a piece of wood, too.
> That doesn't mean it's the right tool for that job.
>
> Good luck with your research, in any case! Innovation pushes things
> forward. But not all innovation results in the technology we think it
> will.
What the hell do you think is innovative about re-inventing something that informed people abandoned 30 years ago? Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 14:53:28 CEST