Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside

From: Dmitry Shuklin <shuklin_at_bk.ru>
Date: 4 Jul 2006 08:16:01 -0700
Message-ID: <1152026160.612354.315780_at_v61g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>

Bob Badour wrote:

> What the hell do you think is innovative about re-inventing something
> that informed people abandoned 30 years ago?

heh, all today playing with XML and XPath are abandoned )) Tree is just a subset of network. Table are subset too. Why do you think that network DB cant merge all capabilities from XML (trees) and RM (tables)? Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 17:16:01 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marshall: "Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me"
Previous message: Dmitry Shuklin: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
Next in thread: Cimode: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message