Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:51:25 GMT
Message-ID: <hvtqg.5988$pu3.136857_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Why ?)) What database based on described conception can't do ? Even
> making application is more comfortable because object relation mapping
> not needed at all.
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:51:25 GMT
Message-ID: <hvtqg.5988$pu3.136857_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
> Hi Bob
>
>>In short, no. What you have implemented is mind-numbingly restricted and >>feeble.
>
> Why ?)) What database based on described conception can't do ? Even
> making application is more comfortable because object relation mapping
> not needed at all.
You are focusing on structure to the exclusion of integrity and manipulation. That's just a dumb mistake. Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 14:51:25 CEST