Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
Date: 21 Jun 2006 02:39:05 -0700
> Cimode wrote:
> > Pickie wrote:
> > > Cimode wrote:
> > > > mAsterdam wrote:
> > > > > Cimode wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > mAsterdam wrote:
> > > > > >>His current content/insult ratio is somewhere near BB's.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this how you discuss RM theory an data management...
> > > > >
> > > > > No, the way it goes lately every potential discussion
> > > > > is smashed in the egg.
> > > > One clever thought...
> > > >
> > > > That's the results of BB' idiots group always diverting issues on
> > > > people rather than ideas...
> > > > People have to react on that and expose all this crappola...The entire
> > > > thread was almost exclusively focused on me...I begin feeling
> > > > honored...
> > > >
> > > > > BTW: Please don't quote the whole post for just one line
> > > > > of new content.
> > > > Thanks for the tip...check out the new threads...
> > > > It should clarify some things to people...Let's see how BB's barking
> > > > dogs know how to discuss issues...
> > >
> > > I'm really impressed how quickly you picked up that the thread was
> > > aimed at you. Is it possible that Marshall was justified?
> > >
> > > In the thread "Little question for RDM theoristes" you said (in
> > > response to a statement by J M Davitt) "What a stupid idiotic
> > > statement!!!". A couple of posts later you said "And you got the nerve
> > > calling me an idiot!!". Since he had quoted your own post, you
> > > responded to yourself, _misinterpreting_ your own statement to mean
> > > that you had called yourself an idiot.
> > >
> > > Another meaning of "cranky" is bad-tempered - you qualify on those
> > > grounds, anyway.
> > Thanks for the explanation of word *crank*...
> > It has however no inherent value to the subjects at hand...Just a
> > prepackaged idea used by BB and some other morons to stick tags on
> > people's forehead when they can't argue with them or when such people
> > prove their wrong...Not convinced?
> > Yeah I qualified the statement as idiotic NOT THE PERSON...Instead of
> > responding about the statement, the ignorant not having any answers
> > prefers to divert attention to my person and insult me...A little
> > introductory note...
> The subject is "Troll vs Crank" and is aimed at YOU.
> It is true that you called the statement idiotic. But J M Davitt did
> not call you an idiot. The only use of any term like idiot was his
> full quote of your post calling the statement idiotic. You persist in
> claiming that he called you an idiot. I now believe he was wrong not
> to have done so.
After all BB'barking dogs have said about PICK, I was telling myself that something they hate so much should not be that bad. I was wrong. Received on Wed Jun 21 2006 - 11:39:05 CEST