Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
Date: 20 Jun 2006 14:49:25 -0700
> Pickie wrote:
> > Cimode wrote:
> > > mAsterdam wrote:
> > > > Cimode wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > mAsterdam wrote:
> > > > >>His current content/insult ratio is somewhere near BB's.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this how you discuss RM theory an data management...
> > > >
> > > > No, the way it goes lately every potential discussion
> > > > is smashed in the egg.
> > > One clever thought...
> > >
> > > That's the results of BB' idiots group always diverting issues on
> > > people rather than ideas...
> > > People have to react on that and expose all this crappola...The entire
> > > thread was almost exclusively focused on me...I begin feeling
> > > honored...
> > >
> > > > BTW: Please don't quote the whole post for just one line
> > > > of new content.
> > > Thanks for the tip...check out the new threads...
> > > It should clarify some things to people...Let's see how BB's barking
> > > dogs know how to discuss issues...
> > I'm really impressed how quickly you picked up that the thread was
> > aimed at you. Is it possible that Marshall was justified?
> > In the thread "Little question for RDM theoristes" you said (in
> > response to a statement by J M Davitt) "What a stupid idiotic
> > statement!!!". A couple of posts later you said "And you got the nerve
> > calling me an idiot!!". Since he had quoted your own post, you
> > responded to yourself, _misinterpreting_ your own statement to mean
> > that you had called yourself an idiot.
> > Another meaning of "cranky" is bad-tempered - you qualify on those
> > grounds, anyway.
> Thanks for the explanation of word *crank*...
> It has however no inherent value to the subjects at hand...Just a
> prepackaged idea used by BB and some other morons to stick tags on
> people's forehead when they can't argue with them or when such people
> prove their wrong...Not convinced?
> Yeah I qualified the statement as idiotic NOT THE PERSON...Instead of
> responding about the statement, the ignorant not having any answers
> prefers to divert attention to my person and insult me...A little
> introductory note...
It is true that you called the statement idiotic. But J M Davitt did not call you an idiot. The only use of any term like idiot was his full quote of your post calling the statement idiotic. You persist in claiming that he called you an idiot. I now believe he was wrong not to have done so. Received on Tue Jun 20 2006 - 23:49:25 CEST