Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:14:40 -0700
Message-ID: <s87392drkgrb3vo6a38osb7hntqt075l4n_at_4ax.com>


On 15 Jun 2006 10:19:49 -0700, "Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

>Yes it is different. Totally different, because it demonstrates a
>totally different motivation on your part.

     I hear an axe grinding.

>Your intention is clearly to dismiss BB's responsability into provoking
>guilt with Rich Ryan. Instead, you favor of saying Rich Ryan is not
>the one living to his own's standard and add more guilt...

     No, it is to recognise the OP's responsibility. Whether Mr. Badour *also* has responsibility is another issue.

>You give it a smooth look-and-feel wax but when you look at the facts
>and only facts it quickly appears all you have said is pure crapola...
>
>Besides, if you believe that what I said is not different from what you
>said then you should agree to it...and stop the BS. The victim here is
>not BB it's Rich Ryan...

     Or there is no victim.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 21:14:40 CEST

Original text of this message