Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:40:33 +0300
Message-ID: <e640ei$70o$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:KXFgg.17468$A26.405810_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> You claim that physical memories are multidimensional; however, on the
But that only say that the usefulness of turing machines should not be
decided based on expressivity. :-)
> I disagree. Confusing a property of a physical address space with a
> Yet, having put a logical structure into a linear memory, you expressed
Some people knows that warm water freezes more rapidly than cold water, but
the scientists had trouble explaining it :-)
Received on Tue Jun 06 2006 - 15:40:33 CEST
> one occasion I recall anyone using a computational model with multiple
> dimensions of memories, it was used in the constructive proof that a
> single-tape turing machine is just as expressive as a multiple-tape
> turing machine.
> property of a logical entity is nonsense. When I put a potato into
> boiling water, I don't conclude that the boiling point of potatos is 100
> degrees celsius nor do I conclude it is a property of cooked potatos as
> opposed to potatos in general.
> a property of the linear memory as a property of the logical structure.
> Don't do that. It's nonsense even if you say it only applies to the
> implementation of the logical structure in the physical address space.