a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer contributions of VI
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:50:54 +0200
Message-ID: <44839b9c$0$31638$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>> paul c wrote:
>>
>>> i'll stick my neck out and say that committee
>>> definitions are usually crap.
>>
>> Committee or no, the ISO/IEC vocabularies are very good, reflect well
>> what educated people mean when they use various terms, and are very
>> illuminating.
>>
>> Creating a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer
>> contributions of vociferous ignorami is counter-productive and just
>> plain dumb.
>
> sure, but the same argument applies to acknowledging idiots.
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:50:54 +0200
Message-ID: <44839b9c$0$31638$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
paul c wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote: >
>> paul c wrote:
>>
>>> i'll stick my neck out and say that committee
>>> definitions are usually crap.
>>
>> Committee or no, the ISO/IEC vocabularies are very good, reflect well
>> what educated people mean when they use various terms, and are very
>> illuminating.
>>
>> Creating a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer
>> contributions of vociferous ignorami is counter-productive and just
>> plain dumb.
>
> sure, but the same argument applies to acknowledging idiots.
Could you be a bit more verbose? Received on Mon Jun 05 2006 - 04:50:54 CEST