Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:26:08 GMT
Message-ID: <Auqfg.15774$A26.366320_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
> ...
>
>
> Bob, I think you'd be on a somewhat stronger footing if you asked RCM for
> some examples of application domains that didn't lend themselves to RDBMSs,
> and then picked them apart, if you could. Stop shaking your head, and
> argue.
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:26:08 GMT
Message-ID: <Auqfg.15774$A26.366320_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Daniel Parker wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:cTmfg.15645$A26.364501_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
>>Robert Martin wrote: >> >>>So for some application domains RDSBs work very >>>poorly, and other mechanisms work much better. >>
> ...
>
>>You are stupid and ignorant, and your intellectual dishonesty accounts >>well for both. Your responses are pointless.
>
> Bob, I think you'd be on a somewhat stronger footing if you asked RCM for
> some examples of application domains that didn't lend themselves to RDBMSs,
> and then picked them apart, if you could. Stop shaking your head, and
> argue.
With all due respect, Daniel, RCM has not raised to the level of an argument. He is only a waste of time, which is why I plonked him.
Why would I go to all of the work of pretending that comparing mechanisms with formalisms has any point at all?!? Did you not read anything of what I wrote? Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 02:26:08 CEST