Re: Relation or attribute and why
From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:28:43 GMT
Message-ID: <%xJdg.504$HV1.333_at_trndny01>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:28:43 GMT
Message-ID: <%xJdg.504$HV1.333_at_trndny01>
"Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE> wrote in message
> ..., but there is also disagreement on terminology.
> Sometimes, that disagreement only becomes apparent in mid-discussion
> when one party realises that another is not using the term the same
> way. It does not require bad faith discussion to have a snarl.
>
Agreed.
The glossary helps in this regard.
> Yes, but we get our share of kooks, too. I refuse to treat such
> with the same respect as a sensible sort.
>
Tomorrow's great discoverer is sometimes today's kook. Not every comment deserves a respectful response. But then again, not every comment deserves a response at all. Received on Fri May 26 2006 - 22:28:43 CEST