Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:25 GMT
Message-ID: <B5M1g.62890$VV4.1177445_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> [..]
>
>
>
> A very bold call indeed - even arrogant when considered in relation to
> respective personal contributions to the art (or the science if you like)!
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:25 GMT
Message-ID: <B5M1g.62890$VV4.1177445_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Frank Hamersley wrote:
> dawn wrote:
>
>> x wrote: >> >>> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>> news:xO51g.61667$VV4.1151927_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca... >>> >>>> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD04xx/EWD498.html >>>> What EWD said about COBOL goes triple for Pick. >>> >>> Thanks for the link. I specially like these ones:
>
>
> [..]
>
>>> "By claiming that they can contribute to software engineering, the soft >>> scientists make themselves even more ridiculous. (Not less dangerous, >>> alas!) >> >> >> Too arrogant, as well as incorrect, in my opinion.
>
>
> A very bold call indeed - even arrogant when considered in relation to
> respective personal contributions to the art (or the science if you like)!
Dawn is a self-aggrandizing ignorant. She wouldn't know correct if it bit her on the ass. Received on Thu Apr 20 2006 - 15:34:25 CEST