Re: Latest version of glossary
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 24 Feb 2006 14:06:23 -0800
Message-ID: <1140818783.512317.6840_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> When one talks about 2-dimensions and arrays in respect to RM, one is
> talking about the visualization, not the underlying model.
Date: 24 Feb 2006 14:06:23 -0800
Message-ID: <1140818783.512317.6840_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
JOG wrote:
>
> When one talks about 2-dimensions and arrays in respect to RM, one is
> talking about the visualization, not the underlying model.
THANK you!
That issue is so fatiguing. I don't understand why it's so hard for people to get. Relations aren't two dimensional.
Funny thing was, whenever this issue came up in comp.lang.java.*, and someone called SQL tables two dimensional and I corrected them, the response was always just "oh, okay."
Marshall Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 23:06:23 CET