Re: Database design
From: Mark Johnson <102334.12_at_compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:11:48 -0800
Message-ID: <kg3ov19jg43us5fm8jbpa38i2p4m6rqhod_at_4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:11:48 -0800
Message-ID: <kg3ov19jg43us5fm8jbpa38i2p4m6rqhod_at_4ax.com>
"JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>Mark Johnson wrote:
>> "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>I have no idea why you have choose define a relation again
Didn't someone request it? I don't follow you.
>I'm going to try and ignore the word 'instance'
Any reason why? Are you trying to change the terms that are commonly used?
>(I can only hope you are not relating a tuple to an object).
Non-parenthetically, if a rock is brown, with a particular scratch value, containing certain inclusions, if all that were a tuple, then the tuple would refer, even relate, to an object. Received on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 08:11:48 CET